"Education Code (EC)
51933 (Outside Source) specifies that school districts are not required to provide comprehensive sexual health education..."
(
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/he/se/sexeducation.asp)
In addition, the state of California requires teachers to "emphasis abstinence" when teaching sex education. With these two stipulations it just seems that there is a huge potential for very important information to be left out.
"In accordance with EC Section 51933, in grades seven through twelve sex education classes shall also teach about:
o abstinence from sexual activity
o
STDs, including their transmission, treatment, and prevention and information about the effectiveness and safety of all Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved methods reducing the risk of contracting
STDso the effectiveness and safety of all contraceptive methods approved by the FDA
o the California law allowing parents to surrender newborn babies to hospitals or other designated sites without legal penalty. "
Problem #1. Studies consistently show that the effectiveness rate of condom usage dramatically increases with education on how to properly use them. You cannot just hand out condoms and tell young people to use them, they need the know how.
Problem #2. I see nothing about peer pressure and dating relationships. Grades 7-12 is prime dating ages, why are we not teaching young people what kinds of behavior to look out for and be aware of? I know of so many high school relationships, including my own, that were abusive, manipulative and/or destructive.
to be continued......